Investors often treat reported earnings as the "yield" of equities due to the wide availability of reported earnings and the ubiquitous Price-to-Earnings ratio, however this can be a misleading measure of the actual economic value created for shareholders if earnings are overstated during cyclical upturns and the subsequent adjustment during downturns is reported as one-time items or direct-to-equity adjustments. I propose an alternate measure, a sum of the change in reported book value and dividends paid out as a proxy for the economic value created in a period.
Over the last 22 years, every $1 of S&P500 reported earnings has only led to $0.76 of dividends + book-value gains. If you exclude 2008, the year in which reported earnings and the alternate measure previously described differ most, every $1.00 of earnings generates only about $0.84 of economic value to investors. The sample, admittedly limited in size, was obtained using Bloomberg. Bold red line indicates a slope of 1, lighter black line is a simple OLS regression trend-line with no intercept.
 |
| Change in BV + dividends vs reported earnings |
 |
| Change in BV + dividends vs reported earnings ex-2008 |
EDIT: A reader helpfully pointed out that I left-out the effect of buy-backs, which accrue to the price of shares but are functionally equivalent to dividends. Lacking a time-series of total buy backs, I can't correct the post to include that. Additionally, any buy-back made at a P/B multiple of > 1 would dilute BV per share. Assuming book value is understated is a reasonable assumption for companies where marginal investment turns out to be profitable or during inflationary periods where the nominal value of capital stock is understated as a result. My apologies for these careless omissions. I will not remove the post, but I think it is worth noting that these omissions make the prior analysis basically useless.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThank you for the post - enjoyed it. A quick question. Wouldn't you need to adjust for share repurchases at a premium to book? For instance, isn't a company buying back shares at 2.0x book worse off (in terms of growth in Book Value Per Share) than a company who just retains the cash on the balance sheet? Or am I just over thinking the analysis?
ReplyDeleteMonopoly, Risk and Clue have roots buried deep in the sands of ancient Mesopotamia. British archeologist Charles Leonard Woolley unearthed the earliest known board game in the late 1920's. The Royal Game of Ur is the earliest known board game to date. 우리카지노바카라
ReplyDeleteThe increased use of IT (information technology) in various aspects of our lives is mainly attributable to the rapid technological advancement especially in the past decade. The video gaming industry has also bloomed significantly and the presence of video games and computer games can be felt everywhere nowadays. سایت تتل بت
ReplyDeleteOn line gaming has been growing steadily ever since its creation in the late 1990s. On line gaming provides video game enthusiasts the opportunity to play against individuals over long distances. Over the past decade, on line gaming has come to replace arcades. The advent of on line gaming has provided both the publishers and players of games new and innovative opportunities. بازی انفجار
ReplyDeleteThose days are gone, when for playing video games one had to spend lots of his or her precious time in installing the desired game on the computer. Nowadays, the trends of entertainment have changed to a large ambit. With the advent of free online games the entire gaming scenario has taken on a new twist. An individual can access a wide option of online games such as online sports, actions, puzzle and adventurous games. سایت شرط بندی حضرات
ReplyDelete